<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ooshirts</title>
	<atom:link href="/2011/03/ooshirts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2011/03/ooshirts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:56:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: amelia</title>
		<link>/2011/03/ooshirts/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amelia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doublejones.com/?p=458#comment-571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I placed an order with ooshirts and there is some very important info consumers should know - even if you sent high quality vector artwork they only use your artwork as a &#034;reference&#034; (their words, not mine). In my case they took vector artwork and retyped all the text with a random font that was close, but different. When I received the proof (which I was looking at on my phone, not the size of the back of a t-shirt) I was looking for things like parts of the graphic missing - not in my wildest dreams did I think I needed to get out my magnifying glass to check that the letters (which had been converted to outlines in the EPS I sent) had not been replaced with a different font! They state that the mere fact that they send a proof should indicate that they altered the art. Don&#039;t most places try to keep the art as close as possible to the way it is sent instead of making unnecessary changes? They told me they don&#039;t usually get artwork that&#039;s high quality. I&#039;m thinking it would be a relief to get a piece of high quality art so they don&#039;t have to mess with it, but I guess they felt compelled to mess with it anyway.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bottom line, if you use this company be sure to specifiy that getting the artwork &#034;close&#034; is not acceptable, scour the proof with a fine toothed comb and don&#039;t assume that even if you sent graphics that should be print ready that there won&#039;t be changes made.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I placed an order with ooshirts and there is some very important info consumers should know &#8211; even if you sent high quality vector artwork they only use your artwork as a &quot;reference&quot; (their words, not mine). In my case they took vector artwork and retyped all the text with a random font that was close, but different. When I received the proof (which I was looking at on my phone, not the size of the back of a t-shirt) I was looking for things like parts of the graphic missing &#8211; not in my wildest dreams did I think I needed to get out my magnifying glass to check that the letters (which had been converted to outlines in the EPS I sent) had not been replaced with a different font! They state that the mere fact that they send a proof should indicate that they altered the art. Don&#39;t most places try to keep the art as close as possible to the way it is sent instead of making unnecessary changes? They told me they don&#39;t usually get artwork that&#39;s high quality. I&#39;m thinking it would be a relief to get a piece of high quality art so they don&#39;t have to mess with it, but I guess they felt compelled to mess with it anyway.</p>
<p>Bottom line, if you use this company be sure to specifiy that getting the artwork &quot;close&quot; is not acceptable, scour the proof with a fine toothed comb and don&#39;t assume that even if you sent graphics that should be print ready that there won&#39;t be changes made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.w3-edge.com/products/


Served from: delightedtobe.com @ 2021-02-03 20:11:56 by W3 Total Cache
-->