<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magazine Redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="/2010/01/magazine-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2010/01/magazine-redesign/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:56:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>/2010/01/magazine-redesign/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lindsay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doublejones.com/?p=170#comment-210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A. No explanation needed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A. No explanation needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>/2010/01/magazine-redesign/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doublejones.com/?p=170#comment-209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Def B- I love the way the simple lines compliment the architecture. With A it looks a little like the styles are competing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I also love the size of B&#039;s subhead- I think it makes better use of the white space.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Def B- I love the way the simple lines compliment the architecture. With A it looks a little like the styles are competing.</p>
<p>I also love the size of B&#39;s subhead- I think it makes better use of the white space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler &#38; Robyn</title>
		<link>/2010/01/magazine-redesign/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyler &#38; Robyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doublejones.com/?p=170#comment-208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, in my highly valued expert opinion (yeah right!) I&#039;m drawn to option A. Can&#039;t explain it, but it&#039;s more inviting than B.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in my highly valued expert opinion (yeah right!) I&#39;m drawn to option A. Can&#39;t explain it, but it&#39;s more inviting than B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren's blog</title>
		<link>/2010/01/magazine-redesign/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren's blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doublejones.com/?p=170#comment-207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Option A. It looks more gentle and inviting, something appropriate for this type of magazine.  Option B (although it&#039;s quite different) reminds me of the &#034;dell&#034; computer labels. &lt;br /&gt;Cute layout though for a magazine!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Option A. It looks more gentle and inviting, something appropriate for this type of magazine.  Option B (although it&#39;s quite different) reminds me of the &quot;dell&quot; computer labels. <br />Cute layout though for a magazine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney</title>
		<link>/2010/01/magazine-redesign/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courtney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doublejones.com/?p=170#comment-206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t tell you the difference between the two, BUT I was drawn to B almost immediately. So I say a definite B.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#39;t tell you the difference between the two, BUT I was drawn to B almost immediately. So I say a definite B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridget</title>
		<link>/2010/01/magazine-redesign/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bridget]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doublejones.com/?p=170#comment-205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am all about option b.  The serif is nice, but i don&#039;t know how well i like it with the image...and sans-seems more universal, especially because this is a magazine cover and they most likely would keep the font the same on each issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;anyway, what i also really like is the shape of the subheading on b.  and i like the shape of the april 2010 and dwell.com on the bottom of a.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;great color choices.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all about option b.  The serif is nice, but i don&#39;t know how well i like it with the image&#8230;and sans-seems more universal, especially because this is a magazine cover and they most likely would keep the font the same on each issue.</p>
<p>anyway, what i also really like is the shape of the subheading on b.  and i like the shape of the april 2010 and dwell.com on the bottom of a.  </p>
<p>great color choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kwistin</title>
		<link>/2010/01/magazine-redesign/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kwistin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doublejones.com/?p=170#comment-204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hmm. i&#039;m usually a sans-serif kind of gal, but i&#039;m diggin&#039; option a. i think those serifs add a little bit of friendliness. option b is more institutional-feeling, which isn&#039;t as &#034;home-y&#034; in my opinion. i also like how option a draws your eyes to the subtitle. it&#039;s also more unique, i think. then again, i like the shape option b makes with the subtitle. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;a lot of help i am, huh? =P&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i&#039;m excited to see it complete :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm. i&#39;m usually a sans-serif kind of gal, but i&#39;m diggin&#39; option a. i think those serifs add a little bit of friendliness. option b is more institutional-feeling, which isn&#39;t as &quot;home-y&quot; in my opinion. i also like how option a draws your eyes to the subtitle. it&#39;s also more unique, i think. then again, i like the shape option b makes with the subtitle. </p>
<p>a lot of help i am, huh? =P</p>
<p>i&#39;m excited to see it complete :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.w3-edge.com/products/


Served from: delightedtobe.com @ 2021-02-03 20:13:38 by W3 Total Cache
-->